Things are forking messed up
- The garden of forking paths
- False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
- False-Positive Citations
- HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known
- Why Most Published Research Is False
- Measuring the Prevelance of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth Telling
But we’re on it: Credibility, transparency and reproducibility
- Psychology’s Renaissance
- Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices
- A Practical Guide for Transparency in Psychological Science
- Practical Tips for Ethical Data Sharing
- Good enough practices in scientific computing
- A manifesto for reproducible science
- Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings – a practical guide
- An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
- Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations
- Benefits of open and high-powered research outweigh costs
- A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings
- Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking
- Improving Psychological Science through Transparency and Openness: An Overview
- Minimizing Mistakes in Psychological Science
- Open Science: A Candid Conversation
Replications
- The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication?
- The Value of Direct Replication
- Making Replication Mainstream
- What to Replicate?
- When and Why to Replicate: Easy as 1, 2, 3?
- Curate Science website showcasing transparent research or replications
- PsychFileDrawer upload or view replication attempts
How Open Science can help you too
- Five Selfish Reasons to Work Reproducibly
- How to use Open Science to become more visible and amplify your work
- Why Grad Students Benefit from Open Science Practices
Image courtesy of seekpng.com